I doubt that Mount Isa's mayor, John Molony, meant to be unkind to "beauty-disadvantaged" women when he put out his call this week for them to proceed pronto to the Isa. The ratio of men to women was five to one, he said, and happiness awaited the beauty-disadvantaged. As I point out in my column today, Mr Molony has it more than slightly wrong - the 2006 census established that the numbers of men and women in his town are almost equal. And the reason for the deprivation among the men was explained by one of my former workmates, Tahnee Watson, a young woman living in Mount Isa, as many of the single women in that town being professionals who would not tolerate yobbos!
"Quite often you will see walking down the street [in Mount Isa] a lass who is not so attractive with a wide smile on her face," mayor Molony said. "Whether it is recollection of something previous or anticipation for the next evening, there is a degree of happiness." In other words, even the beauty-disadvantaged can get their rocks off in Mount Isa.
If there was any doubt about Mr Molony's couthness, he put it to rest when he said 100 women protesting against his comments were blaming him for the way they looked!
Beauty, prettiness, plainness and ugliness are intriguing, and for some painful, concepts. Teenagers become distraught over their imagined ugliness! And I suppose falling short of the standard, whatever it is, can be a disadvantage if you don't live in Mount Isa.
In my column today I point out that I can, of course, see beauty in women, but they are strangers. In the women I know and like I see the person, I see a face that reflects what I like about them, and the attractiveness of that has nought to do with the modern concept of beauty or ugliness. People say that Nicole Kidman is beautiful, but every woman in my life is more attractive than she is. And, truly, I have no idea whatsoever of what constitutes handsome or good looking in men.
What do you see in facial beauty and the alternative?